Thursday, February 09, 2006

Where's the outrage?

Chantel Dunn was an upstanding girl -- she wasn't involved in any trouble and she didn't keep poor company. She had just received a promotion at work and, according to the Toronto Star, Chantel dreamed of attending law school.

She had dreams.

Unfortunately, she won't be able to achieve them because earlier this week, the 19-year-old was shot to death after a basketball game in the north end of Toronto.

My question is: where are all those loud talking politicians who had gun violence as part of the election campaigns? They were up in arms about how violent thugs were toting illegal guns and killing innocents in the heart of the city.

When 15-year-old Jane Creba was killed on Boxing Day while shopping with her family on Yonge St. it seemed that all of Toronto was angry and on the warpath to end gun violence.

Things are eerily quiet right about now.

Stephen Harper's too busy to say anything because he's organizing his new government. Paul Martin's quietly licking his wounds. Where's Jack Layton, champion of the urban dweller? Well, he's congratulating himself and his cabinet for winning those extra seats in the election. Where's police chief Bill Blair vowing to take down the criminals? Where's Mayor David Miller? Oh, he's at the TTC press conference telling me that I'm going to have to pay more to travel by stinking bus.

Where are the throngs of concerned citizens creating makeshift memorials at the site of the murder? Where are all the protests and marches?

Where's the outrage?

Man, Chantel's death wasn't even one of the top stories on last night's news. I think that's when I really started to get angry about it. Jane Creba's death was a hot topic for a good three weeks -- Chantel's been dead, what? Three days? And already it's archived as murder #3 or 4 for 2006?

Last night on CityTV, I heard about the Grammys, the young woman and child who drowned to death in Bradford this past weekend and the TTC fare hike before mention of Chantel's death.

It's kinda eye-opening.

I know I shouldn't be shocked or surprised that Chantel's death is now a footnote and didn't create the public fervor that Jane's death did -- although it is the same situation: innocent teen gunned down in public because she was at the wrong place.

It feels like people don't give a damn when a Black youth is killed. Maybe it does take a young white girl to die to make people care about what's happening. Maybe it's alright when it's only our children and young people being killed. Maybe Jane's death stayed top news for so long 'cause it was election time.

I hope not.

I hope no more Jane Crebas or Chantel Dunns have to die for people to remember.

I remember you, Chantel. And I remember you, Livvette. And I remember all of the people who are being killed over ignorance in this city -- that includes you, Jane.

Rest in peace.

14 Comments:

Blogger Ra said...

In the states we laugh about D.W.B. (Driving while black) and the injustices attached to it. Perhaps the new talk topic should be D.W.B. (Dead while black) - either way the ramifications are serious but seemingly no one REALLY cares.

RIP -- we will remember.

A well thought out and well written post.

Thursday, February 09, 2006 2:07:00 PM  
Blogger The Marlo Girl said...

i just kissed my teeth when i heard it--i knew it wasn't going to make papers internationally--or even in vancouver--as it did when jane creba was shot.

it's all bullshit, and i swear, sometimes it really makes me hate the world.

Friday, February 10, 2006 7:32:00 AM  
Blogger Jellibeenz said...

Urban Sis:

I TOTALLY hear you! This is so on point I can't even tell you. Right now, I'm doing a media relations course and mentioned this exact situation only last Sunday.

I talked about Livvette and the lack of attention on her. I couldn't boldly talk about race in the posting, but I definitely made the point that when I did a Google search on Jane Creba, it brought up all kinds of stories including the BBC.

I dare you all to search for Champagne Lewis (mom with 4 kids, killed at 25) and Livvette Moore and you will get, yup, that's right ----bubkus!!

What you will find is tons of ways to drink champagne, but not a thing about a young women's tragic death. It takes a more detailed search with other keywords to even find a morcel on her. I keep asking myself-- why is that? I don't think the answer will come soon enough for me.

It's testament again that Black people need PR. They need someone to tell their stories. They need rallying groups, more than just anger groups, to get the passion out to the public when these kinds of things happen and the city fails to respond.

Anyway, thanks for posting this and I will post my school response when I can.

Michelle L

Friday, February 10, 2006 7:47:00 AM  
Blogger Jellibeenz said...

This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

Friday, February 10, 2006 7:49:00 AM  
Blogger Miz JJ said...

I read the newspaper everyday and I didn't hear about this until I read your blog. This is getting no recognition outside of Toronto. I am in communications so often times I read a few newspapers. Nada. Must have been buried. Definitely not on the cover of the paper in Vancouver marlo girl. Not like last time.

Why don't we matter??

Friday, February 10, 2006 11:33:00 AM  
Blogger Urban Sista said...

My sister made a very good point last night: we complain to each other, but why don't we approach the media. So, that's what I did. I wrote the Toronto Star and CityTV. Will it change anything? Who knows. But at least I can call them and Canadian society out on their double-standard.

Friday, February 10, 2006 1:15:00 PM  
Blogger solitaire said...

Thanks for this, U-Sis. I didn't know about it until my little brother told me, and someone commented on it on Starfoxx's blog.

An outrage!!

Friday, February 10, 2006 5:50:00 PM  
Blogger Lene said...

I read about it in the excaliber, which is york's newspaper. it pisses me off because that could have been me. the worse part is her punk ass boyfriend jumped out of the car while the shots were being fired. they were aiming for his ass, and she is the one who ends up dead. smh...

Saturday, February 11, 2006 1:40:00 AM  
Blogger Jdid said...

the more things change the more they remain the same

Sunday, February 12, 2006 10:42:00 AM  
Blogger 4panist said...

I've never posted on your site but linked here from Jdid's blog cause this story hits home. I'm glad to see your well written blog and I'm glad you took it up a notch to send your thoughts to the Toronto media. It can't be said that we don't care..even if they don't seem to.
sigh

Tuesday, February 14, 2006 3:56:00 PM  
Blogger tiffaniereid said...

Hey, I just want to respond to your post. I was a friend of Chantel's. She was a good girl, she was smart as a whip and beautiful. I too am outraged at the lack of media attention given to her. I myself am a white girl, but I still am angry and hurt. I wrote to everyone, CityTV, even Oprah!! I think you should all know that the heart in your messages is so meaningful. She was a good girl, man, she really was. I am going to her funeral on saturday. Until then I am seething with anger, anger about how something like this could have happened. Anger over how cowardly her boyfriend was that night, and angry that someone in the community was taken from us.

Friday, February 17, 2006 2:28:00 AM  
Blogger Urban Sista said...

My soul hurts for Chantel, her family and friends. tiffaniereid, stay strong. The media may not remember Chantel, but we do.

Friday, February 17, 2006 9:16:00 AM  
Blogger Jellibeenz said...

***As promised, below is my response for my media relations course. The topic that week was to talk about a story in the news and from a media relations perspective, describe how it met the elements of being newsworthy. Below is a response to one of my classmates****

Tina thanks for posting this topic. I found it interesting.

I wanted to comment on the point you made about Jane Creba. You mentioned that government leaders rallied together since the shooting occurred mid-election. I agree with you and would like to offer another perspective.

I feel in some cases, the way the media choose to cover much of the gun violence in Toronto over the past year played a part in how Jane Creba’s death was reported.

All the other victims who died by the gun in Toronto in 2005 were mostly portrayed as minorities in bad neighbourhoods or in gangs. However, some of the victims were innocent and had families, children and friends that were not prominently shown on TV. We didn’t see any flower memorials for all the other innocent victims in the early days of the gun violence.

I did the following simple searches on Google for:

Champagne Lewis shot in June 2005 http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=champagne+lewis&meta=

Jane Creba shot in December 2005
http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=jane+creba&meta=

From the links, you can see that Jane’s story made international news (i.e. BBC). Champagne Lewis for example, doesn’t even register. I even did a search on our Proquest service at Ryerson and the same situation. Lots of coverage on Jane and none on Champagne.

My point? Media relations plays an important role in critical matters like this. I don’t think the stories of the other innocent victims received enough national and global attention that would make politicians truly sit up and take notice.

In the case of Champagne Lewis, they didn’t humanize her story and today we know nothing about her life and how she died. We know a lot more about Jane Creba and the public outcry that followed.

I feel they’re numerous political and socio-economic reasons why there wasn’t more attention to the innocent deaths prior to Jane Creba, but perhaps through raising awareness of Jane’s tragic death, the other innocents may finally benefit.

Michelle

Friday, February 17, 2006 6:50:00 PM  
Blogger Urban Sista said...

Thanks Jellibeenz for the comment. We need to bring this inconsistency up whenever we see it. For real.

Monday, February 20, 2006 9:48:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home